Interview  with British Press 
          
            March 1990 
            Question:  You have spoken about blacks and whites sharing power. Would you  consider a system of separate electoral rolls for blacks and whites?
              
             Answer: No, because the perception that would then arise among our  people would be that, in so far as the West is concerned, they are  prepared for democracy on the basis of one man one vote, but not as far  as South Africa is concerned. The democratic principle is the only  answer and we are saying that one man one vote follows the same  principle which is adopted in England. The only difference is that we  have a large and important minority whose fears must be addressed. 
            
             This is why I favour a bill of rights which would be above politics and  give every citizen protection through the courts, if necessary against  the government. 
            
             The first democratic government that is formed must contain  representatives of every population group. This will inspire confidence  that we now have a new government which has ceased to think in terms of  colour. There will then be no need to think in terms of separate rolls. 
            
             We don't want to do anything to perpetuate racialism . In Britain you  have a minority of blacks, but there is no talk of separate rolls. 
            
             In America you have got a substantial group of blacks. but no talk of separate rolls. That is the proper way. 
            
             Question: What about the problem of the economic disparity between white and black people? 
            
             Answer: People have been disturbed by the statement I made about  nationalisation. It happened because of an interview given to a  newspaper (The Sunday Telegraph) by a friend of mine. Richard Maponya.  a very wealthy black businessman. He is married to my cousin. He  visited me in Victor Verster prison and then he said: "Mr Mandela has  turned his back on nationalisation... 
            
             You must understand that our policy on this was set out in the Freedom  Charter as far back as 1959. So this quotation of what I was supposed  to have said could have created a storm amongst my own people.  Especially the ANC. 
            
             So I issued a statement in which I merely reaffirmed our policy: ''The  nationalisation of the mines. the financial institutions and monopoly  industries is the fundamental policy of the ANC and it is inconceivable  that we will ever change this policy... 
            
             I was replying to a specific statement that was made about me. That is  what led to this hue and cry. Now, in the first place, there is a  misunderstanding over the history of this country. The economy of this  country is based partly on nationalisation. The railways. the post  office, South African Airways, are all in the public sector. The steel  industry was only privatised towards the end of last year. 
            
             So what is wrong with saying that we will nationalise the mines ,  financial institutions and other monopoly industries? Especially if we  plan to leave the rest of the economy based on free enterprise, on a  market economy? And then on nationalisation itself. We don't propose to  force it down the throats of the people. We will have a referendum on  things of this nature.... 
            
             We want businessmen in this country to remain. We want businessmen to  support us . And we will discuss this issue with them of how  nationalisation should be structured. I mean, it can take the form of  the government having 5 1 per cent of a particular industry. It may  actually have 40 per cent of that industry, with other interests  allowed to take shares.... 
            
             What we want is an equitable distribution of the wealth of the country  and nationalisation must just be understood to be one strategy in that  grand aim.... 
            
             Question: And you are not thinking in terms either of a one-party state, or of a Marxist state? 
            
             Answer: Oh, no, we're not thinking in terms of a one-party state. 
            
             Question: Or of a Marxist state? 
            
             Answer: No, the ANC is not a Marxist organisation. We have got an  alliance with the Communist party and that alliance has been there  since the 1920s. 
            
             It has been defended by Africans who themselves were anti-Communists in  the 1940s when we young ANC members wanted the Communists driven out of  the organisation. 
            
             Just as in Britain, France and other European countries, Communists are  allowed to be elected to parliament; we allowed them in our ANC  parliament here. This is our tradition. 
            
             So in the 1940s we young people who wanted them thrown out were  defeated. And the Communists themselves in the ANC never opened their  mouths. It was our leaders who got their education in America, England  and Germany who insisted on keeping them in the ANC. 
            
             Any African who is against apartheid, no matter what his individual views are, is entitled to join the ANC. 
            
             And we have kept that tradition. There is no idea of establishing a  Communist state from the point of view of the ANC. But we respect the  alliance between the ANC and the party. 
                Source: Nelson Mandela Foundation   |